Certified Agentic Architect
Certified to design agentic systems: tool contracts, orchestration, evaluation, and fleet architecture.
SPECIMEN. A demonstration entry from the seed registry, published to show the shape of a record. It is not an issued credential and no person holds it.
IN REVIEW. Submitted and under assessment. Nothing has been issued — this entry is a pending record, and no claim of certification is made on it.
Every node this credential stands on — its own track up to its level, plus the full prerequisite closure behind that, derived from the skill graph rather than restated by hand. Each is matched to the work on this record that closed it.
- n-l0-1Mental modelsFNDNO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l0-2Tool stackFNDNO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l0-3Prompt specsFNDNO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l1-1First workflowFNDNO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l1-2Personal AI OSFNDNO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l2-3Agent anatomyAGINO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l2-4Tools & MCPAGINO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l3-4OrchestrationAGINO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l3-5Agent evalsAGINO ARTIFACT LINKED
- n-l3-6Agent fleetAGIART-25Fleet architecture + working two-agent slice with evalsUNDER REVIEW
9 of 10 nodes carry no artifact on this record. They are listed unresolved rather than omitted — a registry that printed only the backed half would read as complete, and would be worth less than nothing to the person auditing it.
What AINO-A requires of anyone who holds it. Published terms for the credential class, not a transcript of this holder's assessment.
- 10 nodes: L0–L1 foundations, agents track through L3
- Reviewed capstone evidence: two-agent slice + fleet architecture
- Running gate — live-reviewed artifact coverage across the required graph
- Planned defense — contracts, gates, failure modes, and economics after vetted examiner coverage
This page publishes the credential, the gate it stands on, and the artifacts linked to it. It does not publish artifact bodies, assessment transcripts, reviewer identities, or the holder's name — the registry is public and the work is not. An id that resolves to nothing returns 404, never a page.
For every artifact linked to this credential: the node it closes, the published rubric it was scored against, who reviewed it, the date, and the verdict. Each review stores its kind — AI or expert — at the moment it is written. Nothing on this page is inferred from a status.
- AI REVIEW · MODEL NAMED
- A model scored this artifact against the module's published rubric, one criterion at a time on a 0–4 scale. The model that scored it is named above. This is a machine verdict on a submitted artifact — it is not a human judgment, and it is not a statement about the person.
- AI REVIEW · NO MODEL RAN
- No model reviewed this artifact. A keyword and length check ran because no review provider was reachable, and that check cannot verify anything: the pass flag is forced false on this path, so it can neither mark an artifact verified nor close a graph node. It is recorded because the submission happened, not because it was assessed.
- EXPERT REVIEW
- A human practitioner reviewed this artifact against the same published rubric and recorded the verdict under their own account. Expert review is a distinct kind from AI review, written at the time of review; no model produces it and no process converts one into the other.
No expert review is recorded against any artifact on this record. Every verdict below came from a model scoring the work against a published rubric. Expert review is stored as a separate kind, and where it has not happened this record says so rather than leaving the question open.
Agent fleet · Agentic Workflows & AI Agents
- 01Architecture defines scoped roles, handoffs, shared-state rules
- 02Every failure mode has a named owner
- 03Cost model per run is included
- 04Two-agent slice runs with evals green
- AI REVIEW2026-07-27NOT PASSEDREVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8RUBRIC SCORE63 / 100 · PASS AT 70
- AI REVIEWNO MODEL RAN2026-07-20NO VERDICTREVIEWED BYOffline heuristicRUBRIC SCORE25 / 100 · PASS AT 70
No model reviewed this artifact. A keyword and length check ran because no review provider was reachable, and that check cannot verify anything: the pass flag is forced false on this path, so it can neither mark an artifact verified nor close a graph node. It is recorded because the submission happened, not because it was assessed.
- Which graph node each artifact was submitted against, and which module's rubric scored it. Both are printed on the artifact's panel, with the criteria in full.
- Which kind of reviewer produced each verdict. Every review stores one of two values — AI or expert — at the time it is written.
- The date of each review and the verdict it returned.
- That nothing here was verified by an offline check. Verification requires a live model review or an expert one; the heuristic path is forced to fail before a status is written.
- That a human read the work — unless a panel on this page is marked EXPERT REVIEW. Where there is none, the record states it outright rather than staying quiet.
- That the holder can do this work today. Read the review dates; a credential carries a term, not a guarantee of current practice.
- Anything about the artifact's contents. Bodies, per-criterion notes, and reviewer feedback stay in the holder's workspace and are not published here.
- Employment, identity, or conduct. This record covers assessed work and nothing else.