Skip to content
[ CREDENTIAL REGISTRY ]PUBLIC RECORD
AINO-D-0007

Certified AI Native Developer

AINO-DL3 · AI Native OperatorAI Native Developers

Certified to build with agents: spec-driven development, agentic TDD, and production agent systems with evals.

STATUS
SPECIMEN
ISSUED
2026-07-14
TERM ENDS
2028-07-14

SPECIMEN. A demonstration entry from the seed registry, published to show the shape of a record. It is not an issued credential and no person holds it.

REGISTRY ENTRY
REGISTRY IDAINO-D-0007
CREDENTIALAINO-D
HOLDEROP-217
LEVELL3
TRACKAI Native Developers
ISSUED2026-07-14
VALIDITY2 years
GATE14 nodes
TRAIL14 / 14 nodes with a linked artifact
REQUIREMENT LEDGER14 / 14 RESOLVED

Every node this credential stands on — its own track up to its level, plus the full prerequisite closure behind that, derived from the skill graph rather than restated by hand. Each is matched to the work on this record that closed it.

L0AI Curious3 NODES
  1. n-l0-1Mental modelsFND
    ART-11Calibration log: three variants, one drift
    VERIFIED
  2. n-l0-2Tool stackFND
    ART-12Stack map with two identified gaps
    VERIFIED
  3. n-l0-3Prompt specsFND
    ART-13Constraint analysis across three tasks
    VERIFIED
L1AI Capable2 NODES
  1. n-l1-1First workflowFND
    ART-14Delivery-loop definition with a caught checkpoint
    VERIFIED
  2. n-l1-2Personal AI OSFND
    ART-15Personal AI OS with three days of retros
    VERIFIED
L2AI Practitioner4 NODES
  1. n-l2-1AI native envDEV
    ART-16AGENTS.md and an agent diff that failed twice
    VERIFIED
  2. n-l2-2Spec-driven devDEV
    ART-17Executable spec, agent plan, green diff
    VERIFIED
  3. n-l2-3Agent anatomyAGI
    ART-18Agent config with an annotated execution trace
    VERIFIED
  4. n-l2-4Tools & MCPAGI
    ART-19Tool contract v1 to v2, with the failure that forced it
    VERIFIED
L3AI Native Operator5 NODES
  1. n-l3-1Agentic TDDDEV
    ART-20TDD transcript with mutation-test evidence
    VERIFIED
  2. n-l3-2Review machine codeDEV
    ART-21Risk-tiered review of an agent PR
    VERIFIED
  3. n-l3-3Ship an agentDEV
    ART-22Production agent with two green eval runs
    VERIFIED
  4. n-l3-4OrchestrationAGI
    ART-23Three-agent orchestration with both gates evidenced
    VERIFIED
  5. n-l3-5Agent evalsAGI
    ART-24Three-layer eval suite and the adversarial fix
    VERIFIED
CERTIFICATION SPEC — AINO-D

What AINO-D requires of anyone who holds it. Published terms for the credential class, not a transcript of this holder's assessment.

REQUIRES
  • 14 nodes: L0–L1 foundations, agent anatomy through evaluation, developer track through L3
  • Reviewed capstone evidence: an agent release package with an eval suite
ASSESSED BY
  • Running gate — live-reviewed artifact coverage across the required graph
  • Planned defense — architecture, evals, and rollback after vetted examiner coverage
SCOPE OF THIS RECORD

This page publishes the credential, the gate it stands on, and the artifacts linked to it. It does not publish artifact bodies, assessment transcripts, reviewer identities, or the holder's name — the registry is public and the work is not. An id that resolves to nothing returns 404, never a page.

REVIEW PROVENANCE14 / 14 ARTIFACTS REVIEWED

For every artifact linked to this credential: the node it closes, the published rubric it was scored against, who reviewed it, the date, and the verdict. Each review stores its kind — AI or expert — at the moment it is written. Nothing on this page is inferred from a status.

ARTIFACTS14
MODEL-REVIEWED14
EXPERT-REVIEWED0
HOW TO READ A VERDICT
AI REVIEW · MODEL NAMED
A model scored this artifact against the module's published rubric, one criterion at a time on a 0–4 scale. The model that scored it is named above. This is a machine verdict on a submitted artifact — it is not a human judgment, and it is not a statement about the person.
AI REVIEW · NO MODEL RAN
No model reviewed this artifact. A keyword and length check ran because no review provider was reachable, and that check cannot verify anything: the pass flag is forced false on this path, so it can neither mark an artifact verified nor close a graph node. It is recorded because the submission happened, not because it was assessed.
EXPERT REVIEW
A human practitioner reviewed this artifact against the same published rubric and recorded the verdict under their own account. Expert review is a distinct kind from AI review, written at the time of review; no model produces it and no process converts one into the other.
NO EXPERT REVIEW ON RECORD

No expert review is recorded against any artifact on this record. Every verdict below came from a model scoring the work against a published rubric. Expert review is stored as a separate kind, and where it has not happened this record says so rather than leaving the question open.

ART-11Calibration log: three variants, one drift
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l0-1
MODULEThinking in models

Mental models · AI Native Foundations

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 3 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01All 3 prompt variants target the same question from different angles
  2. 02Drift analysis names at least one concrete failure mode
  3. 03Trust rules are stated as testable conditions, not vibes
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-03-05PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE83 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-12Stack map with two identified gaps
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l0-2
MODULEThe AI native tool stack

Tool stack · AI Native Foundations

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 3 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Every tool on the map carries a job label from the four-job taxonomy
  2. 02Map fits one screen and shows your real stack, not an idealized one
  3. 03Both gaps are tied to a recurring task and argue for an agent
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-03-19PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE75 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-13Constraint analysis across three tasks
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l0-3
MODULEPrompting as specification

Prompt specs · AI Native Foundations

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01After-prompt includes an output schema and defined failure behavior
  2. 02Both versions run on the same three inputs, outputs attached
  3. 03Analysis names which constraints actually changed behavior
  4. 04At least one test input is an edge or break case
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-04-02PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE81 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-14Delivery-loop definition with a caught checkpoint
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l1-1
MODULEDesigning your first AI workflow

First workflow · AI Native Foundations

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Definition covers trigger, gather, generate, verify, act
  2. 02Two run logs on different inputs are attached
  3. 03Checkpoint analysis states what the gate caught or would have
  4. 04Hours-saved estimate shows the math
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-04-16PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE88 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-15Personal AI OS with three days of retros
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l1-2
MODULEYour personal AI operating system

Personal AI OS · AI Native Foundations

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Design fits one page: inputs, three AI stages, review gates
  2. 02Every stage names its review gate explicitly
  3. 03Retro notes cover three consecutive days
  4. 04Retro answers the stated weekly question with evidence
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-04-30PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE81 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-16AGENTS.md and an agent diff that failed twice
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l2-1
MODULEThe AI native dev environment

AI native env · AI Native Developers

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01AGENTS.md has exact commands, conventions, and forbidden zones
  2. 02Agent's diff was produced using only the file as guidance
  3. 03Failure analysis cites specific guidance gaps, not “model error”
  4. 04File is patched from the failure analysis — v1 and v2 shown
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-05-07PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE75 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-17Executable spec, agent plan, green diff
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l2-2
MODULESpec-driven development with agents

Spec-driven dev · AI Native Developers

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Spec separates unresolved decisions and dependency edges, then contains intent, constraints, acceptance criteria, and a test plan
  2. 02Acceptance criteria are falsifiable and numbered
  3. 03Review notes on the agent's plan are attached
  4. 04Final diff is green on build, lint, and tests
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-05-21PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE88 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-18Agent config with an annotated execution trace
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l2-3
MODULEAnatomy of an agent

Agent anatomy · Agentic Workflows & AI Agents

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Config uses exactly one tool and an explicit stop condition
  2. 02Trace is complete from task to termination
  3. 03Each decision point is annotated with the dial it belongs to
  4. 04At least one poor loop decision is identified and diagnosed
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-06-04PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE81 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-19Tool contract v1 to v2, with the failure that forced it
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l2-4
MODULETools, MCP, and protocols

Tools & MCP · Agentic Workflows & AI Agents

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01v1 contract has a strict input schema and enumerated errors
  2. 02Documented agent failure is reproducible from a trace
  3. 03v2 change directly addresses the observed failure
  4. 04Side effects and idempotency are noted
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-06-11PASSED
    REVIEWED BYopenai/gpt-5.5
    RUBRIC SCORE81 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-20TDD transcript with mutation-test evidence
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l3-1
MODULETest-driven agentic coding

Agentic TDD · AI Native Developers

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Failing tests were written before the agent implemented
  2. 02Agent did not touch tests and implementation in the same step
  3. 03Transcript shows failing run → implementation → passing run
  4. 04One deliberate mutation is caught; the evidence names each applicable feedback layer and explains any omission
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-06-18PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE94 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-21Risk-tiered review of an agent PR
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l3-2
MODULEReviewing machine code

Review machine code · AI Native Developers

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Every hunk in the PR is assigned a risk tier
  2. 02Agent's answers on boundaries and assumptions are recorded
  3. 03Two demanded changes are specific and justified by tier
  4. 04Review hunts invariants, not style
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-06-25PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE81 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-22Production agent with two green eval runs
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l3-3
MODULEShip an agent to production

Ship an agent · AI Native Developers

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Agent has scoped tools and structured outputs
  2. 02Captured events are minimum-necessary, redacted, access-controlled, and retention-bounded
  3. 03Release gates justify critical misses, coverage, and repetitions from consequence and observed variance; measured cost assumptions name the model/configuration, dated source, sample window, and expiry
  4. 04The owner has exercised containment, rollback, and recovery verification in the declared order
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-07-09PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE94 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-23Three-agent orchestration with both gates evidenced
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l3-4
MODULEOrchestrating multi-step agents

Orchestration · Agentic Workflows & AI Agents

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Gatherer, drafter, critic roles with explicit handoff contracts
  2. 02Human gate sits before output ships
  3. 03Two run logs on real material attached
  4. 04Analysis separates what the critic caught vs the human gate
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-07-02PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE88 / 100 · PASS AT 70
ART-24Three-layer eval suite and the adversarial fix
VERIFIED
CLOSES NODEn-l3-5
MODULEEvaluating agent behavior

Agent evals · Agentic Workflows & AI Agents

SCORED AGAINST THIS RUBRIC · 4 CRITERIA · 0–4 EACH
  1. 01Suite covers unit, trajectory, and outcome layers
  2. 02Adversarial case is designed to induce a real failure
  3. 03Results attached, including the reds
  4. 04Fix is verified by a rerun of the adversarial case
REVIEWS ON RECORD · 1
  • AI REVIEW
    2026-07-12PASSED
    REVIEWED BYanthropic/claude-opus-4-8
    RUBRIC SCORE88 / 100 · PASS AT 70
WHAT THIS ENTRY PROVES
ON THE RECORD
  • Which graph node each artifact was submitted against, and which module's rubric scored it. Both are printed on the artifact's panel, with the criteria in full.
  • Which kind of reviewer produced each verdict. Every review stores one of two values — AI or expert — at the time it is written.
  • The date of each review and the verdict it returned.
  • That nothing here was verified by an offline check. Verification requires a live model review or an expert one; the heuristic path is forced to fail before a status is written.
NOT ON THE RECORD
  • That a human read the work — unless a panel on this page is marked EXPERT REVIEW. Where there is none, the record states it outright rather than staying quiet.
  • That the holder can do this work today. Read the review dates; a credential carries a term, not a guarantee of current practice.
  • Anything about the artifact's contents. Bodies, per-criterion notes, and reviewer feedback stay in the holder's workspace and are not published here.
  • Employment, identity, or conduct. This record covers assessed work and nothing else.
The registryHow certification worksEarn yours